Book salon: ‘Judicial Politics in Polarized Times’ – an interview with Thomas M. Keck

30th April 17:00 (hybrid) at Bergen Global.

As part of the Book Salons on Constitution, Courts, and Politics, UiB students along with Siri Gloppen interview Thomas M. Keck on his book ‘Judicial Politics in Polarized Times‘.

This event is free to attend and open to all

About the book:

Drawing on a sweeping survey of litigation on abortion, affirmative action, gay rights, and gun rights across the Clinton, Bush, and Obama eras, Thomas M. Keck argues that, while each of these stories captures part of the significance of judicial politics in polarized times, each is also misleading. Despite judges’ claims, actual legal decisions are not the politically neutral products of disembodied legal texts. But neither are judges “tyrants in robes,” undermining democratic values by imposing their own preferences. Just as often, judges and the public seem to be pushing in the same direction. As for the argument that the courts are powerless institutions, Keck shows that their decisions have profound political effects. And, while advocates on both the left and right engage constantly in litigation to achieve their ends, neither side has consistently won. Ultimately, Keck argues, judges respond not simply as umpires, activists, or political actors, but in light of distinctive judicial values and practices.