This seminar series – which started in August 2019 – will address some of the key questions within transitional justice. The issues discussed are relevant in today’s world, history and will continue to be relevant in the future.
Transitional justice is an important part of rehabilitation, state- and peace-building after conflict. However, it can also be part of a society that is recovering from a repressive regime or going through regime change. Although the tendency has been for truth commissions in transitional societies or after authoritarianism and conflict, there is a growing trend towards colonial and democratic states adopting truth commissions or other transitional mechanisms to right wrongs committed against their indigenous and minority populations. Broadly, the aim of transitional justice is to rebuild and reconcile society, bring perpetrators to account and provide a sense of justice for victims and survivors. Ultimately, it aims to help repair society. An important aspect of this is public recognition of the wrongs of the past, not only through formal mechanisms such as truth commissions, but also though public discussions, raising knowledge and awareness.
In September 2017, the Norwegian Parliament established a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) to investigate centuries of repressive state policies against the Indigenous Sami and Kven minority. These policies formed part of the state’s ‘Norwegianisation’ policy (fornorskningspolitikken) that aimed towards a homogenous Norwegian population, with the effect of marginalising and repressing minority groups. Norway’s renewed attention to their past wrongs is in line with an increasing global concern on how to address past repressions, atrocities and human rights abuses. Law and legal mechanisms are increasingly important tools for addressing violence and societal change. Multiple societies globally are incorporating aspects of transitional justice which focus on addressing past human rights abuses that were perpetuated by the state during a period of conflict or tension.
The series will address transitional justice in Norway and beyond, and includes broad discussions of transitional justice across different contexts.
This seminar series has been sponsored by Fritt-Ord and is a collaboration between LawTransform, CMI, the University of Bergen and Bergen Global.
Previous seminars in the series
Indigenous reconciliation and land rights
Ranjan Datta in conversation with Camila Gianella. This presentation addressed a number of unanswered questions in current practices of reconciliation and land rights, including: Is reconciliation an end goal to be achieved or is it a process? What is the colonial history of this region? Who occupied these lands before the establishment of the current borders & national government? What does anti-colonial struggle look like in this area? Are there any active anti-colonial struggles going on? This presentation will discuss initiate these transdisciplinary questions that challenged not only our static science and social science mindsets, but taken the responsibilities for reconciliation including: building respectful relationships with Indigenous people, respecting Indigenous Treaties, taking actions decolonizing our ways knowing and acting, learning the role of colonized education processes, protecting our land and environment, and developing transnational solidarity.
Watch the live-stream here.
Promoting justice during conflict
Transitional justice is most often treated as a concept that ‘deals with the past’ and consequently focus on retrospective institutional attempts at dealing with injustices. Less attention has therefore been afforded to the study of how demands and claims of justice are pursued during conflict – especially under circumstances where there are ostensibly no visible transition occurring and mechanisms of justice seem remote. The Syrian conflict has seen the rise of diaspora activism concerned with various forms of transitional justice, ranging from detailed roadmaps for a political transition to open hearings abroad for victims to speak freely about their experiences.
Justice done? How Cambodia is dealing with its past
From 1975 to 1979 the Khmer Rouge killed approximately 2 million people, which was equivalent to 25% of the population. But the young Cambodians who were born after the fall of the Khmer Rouge show little interest in dealing with their country’s past. This presentation touched on various issues of the genocide and discussed whether the Khmer Rouge Tribunal made a meaningful contribution to healing the wounds of the past.
Watch the live-stream here.
The Sami truth commission in comparative perspective
In 2018 the Norwegian Parliament established a truth and reconciliation commission to look into historic abuses committed against the Norway’s Sami and Kven minorities. But within the Sami population there was significant resistance against this process. Similar commissions are underway or being discussed within and beyond Norway. This roundtable discusses the potential and possible pitfalls of truth commissions looking into abuses against indigenous peoples in a comparative perspective.